‘Not with Words of Wisdom’ / 07.08.2011
In this chapter of his first epistle to the Corinthians, Paul invited them to speak the same thing, and by this he didn’t mean that he wants them to have the same human opinions, but for their opinions to be based on the Gospel that the apostle preached them with. He also warned them not to have divisions between them, because if they had Christ’s mind in them they shall not be divided from each other. He also told them that Chloe’s household- i.e. the servants of a woman in their church named Chloe- told him that they have quarrels among them concerning people they follow: Some say that they follow Paul the author of the epistle, others said that they follow another apostle named Apollos that had a relationship with the church of Corinth, and another group said that they follow Christ. Paul wants them to be only for Christ and not for anyone of the apostles that preached them.
And to prove that he doesn’t want followers, he gave them two reasons. For the first reason he said: Is Christ divided? And for the second reason: What is the important of Paul? He wasn’t crucified for you neither baptized you in his name because no one can do anything except in the name of the Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit as the Lord ordered us to do.
Paul insisted that he didn’t baptize anyone except Crispus and Gaios so that it wouldn’t be understood that he baptized in his own name. He also said that he baptized the household of Stephan, i.e. Stephan, his wife and kids. This is what the word household refers to. And he assures that Christ didn’t send him to baptize but to preach.
And when he used this word, he clarified that he didn’t preach with words of wisdom, i.e. with human eloquence or beautiful composition but with the simplicity of the Gospel. If he had gotten his own words, he would be abolishing Christ’s crucifixion. After that, he spoke extensively about the cross. When the preacher stresses on the cross, its meaning and influence on our lives, he doesn’t leave any human words in him anymore.
Of course, the preacher composes with his expressions and style, and this is inevitable. However, his words won’t have any content except from the Gospel and from what we got from early Christians, from the saints and Church fathers that didn’t say their own words but translated the Gospel into the language of the people.
Everything we have, the thing that saves, is to remind the faithful about the salvation they got and to clarify for them how they could maintain the Gospel through their behavior.
On this basis, it is not very recommended for the priest to have philosophical ideas or poetic phrases in his preaching. It is essential that he doesn’t mention intellectuals from this world that wrote in our language or other languages.
This doesn’t mean that he should repeat the words of the Epistle or Gospel in the language of the people as if people didn’t understand what they heard. It is required from the preacher to reveal the deep meaning of the text that was read, I mean the meanings that could be related to the minds of the listeners. He must put an effort on the level of the core and the essence of the text that was read.
The important thing is not for the hearts to be moved with the eloquence of the speaker but to repent to God through the divine words that we try to deliver to people as God wanted. What did the inspiration want to say through the Epistle and the Gospel? We move through this inspiration only, to reach what the Lord wanted through the inspiration that was given to the author of the Epistle and the Gospel.
Only through this, we can fight our desires and become detached from our iniquities. Through this, we shall become, through the purification of hearts, the living word of God. The job of the preacher is to make us only have the word of God in us.
Translated by Mark Najjar
Original Text: “لا بحكمة كلام” –Raiati 32- 07.08.2011
Continue reading